iceberg logo
iceberg logo
Edition No. 2
September 2026

George’s Take on Attracting Proven Cyber Revenue Generators

What the strongest Cyber salespeople are asking in 2026 - and what it tells us about the GTM market.
George Taylor
George Taylor
Recruitment Consultant

One thing has become pretty clear from the conversations I am having with Cyber salespeople this year. The best ones are asking better questions.

Of course compensation matters. So does territory, title and the accounts they might inherit. But that is no longer where the conversation ends.

More and more of the people I speak with want to understand the company behind the job. They want to know if the number is realistic, whether the product actually wins and what they are walking into before leaving a good role. I think hiring managers should welcome that.

A good salesperson should qualify the opportunity.

If someone is expected to challenge a CISO, qualify a seven-figure deal and work out whether an opportunity is real, I would expect them to apply exactly the same thinking to their own career.

THE BIG QUESTION

If you hire sales persons for their ability to qualify leads, why be surprised when they qualify you?

Cyber companies are generally very good at interviewing salespeople. I am not sure every company is as prepared to be interviewed by them. We ask candidates to prove the numbers. What was your quota? What did you achieve? Which logos did you personally win? How much was genuine net new? All fair questions. But the strongest candidates are now applying the same scrutiny in return:
  • What percentage of the sales team actually hit quota last year?
  • Is the quota based on what the team is achieving or what the board wants to achieve?
  • Where does pipeline come from and how much am I expected to create myself?
  • Why is the territory open and what happened to the last person?
  • Where does the product genuinely beat the competition?
  • What does the customer normally buy first and where does expansion come from?
  • What would a good first 12 months actually look like?
WHAT I'M SEEING FROM THE MARKET

1. A big OTE gets attention. Evidence gets commitment.

A $300k or $400k OTE will always get attention. It is the golden carrot. But experienced sellers know OTE and achievable OTE can be two very different things. The question I hear more often now is not simply 'what is the quota?'. It is 'how many people are actually hitting it?' Cyber GTM Pulse | August 2026 The same applies to pipeline. Inheriting $2m that has been sitting in Salesforce for nine months is not necessarily better than starting with less at a business with a strong SDR, partner and marketing engine. Good candidates are getting better at separating pipeline on a slide from pipeline they can actually close.

2. Product due diligence matters more in a consolidating market.

Cyber is crowded and the largest platforms are getting broader. Palo Alto Networks reported in Q3 FY26 that roughly 65% of its NGS ARR was from platformised customers. That matters to anyone considering a smaller vendor. The question is no longer just whether the technology is good. It is why a CISO will create budget for another product rather than consolidate with a platform already in the estate. A strong seller will ask that before joining because they know every prospect will ask it afterwards.

3. Good candidates want the difficult parts too.

I think businesses sometimes oversell a role because they are worried honesty will put someone off. With senior salespeople, I usually find the opposite. If the territory needs rebuilding, say it. If there is very little inbound, say it. If the last person missed target, explain why. If there has been leadership change or restructuring, give the context. Rapid7 is one recent reminder that even established Cyber businesses are being deliberate about where they put people and money. In Q2 2026 it initiated a restructuring affecting around 12% of its workforce as it aligned resources around its core platform solutions. The strongest salespeople are used to difficult markets. What they do not like is discovering the difficult part three months after joining.

ONE NUMBER THAT MATTERS
%
Roughly the proportion of Palo Alto Networks' NGS ARR coming from platformised customers in Q3 FY26. For sellers assessing smaller vendors, that makes differentiation and category relevance part of career due diligence, not just product due diligence.
FOR HIRING MANAGERS

Be ready to sell the reality, not just the opportunity.

I would stop treating candidate questions as the ten minutes at the end of an interview. For the level of seller most Cyber businesses tell me they want, this is part of the assessment.

  • Know what attainment actually looks like across the team.
  • Explain why the territory is available without dressing it up.
  • Be clear on where pipeline comes from and what the rep owns.
  • Have proof of where the product wins and be honest about where it loses.
  • Explain what support exists after day one and what a realistic ramp looks like.
  • Make sure your recruiter can tell the same story you can.

That last point matters. If I cannot clearly explain why somebody should leave a good job to join a business, it becomes much harder to attract the people the client actually wants.

FOR CYBER SALESPEOPLE

Due diligence is not about finding a perfect job.

There is no perfect territory and no Cyber vendor where every rep hits target. The point is to understand the risk and decide whether it is a risk you know how to manage.

A blank territory can be a brilliant opportunity for a real hunter. A crowded market can still be a great place to sell if the product genuinely wins. A start-up can be a fantastic move if the leadership knows exactly who they sell to and why customers care.

Ask about attainment. Ask where pipeline comes from. Ask why people have left. Ask what customers actually buy the product for. Ask where the business wins and loses.

Can I genuinely see myself hitting this number?

If the answer is not clear, another $20k on the base probably should not be the thing that convinces you.

MY PREDICTION

Cyber companies will compete on credibility as much as compensation.

I think candidate due diligence will become one of the biggest differences between average and excellent Cyber GTM hiring over the next 12 to 18 months.

The best sellers have options. The companies that attract them will not necessarily be the ones offering the biggest package. They will be the ones that can give a candidate confidence that the number has been thought through, the product has a real place in the market and the leadership team knows how they are going to win.

A good salesperson is going to qualify all three.